adenadel
โจย Computational biology PhD student at Brown University. Previously a bioinformatics scientist at Illumina.
๐ Joined in 2015
๐ผ 2,915 Karma
โ๏ธ 768 posts
๐
15 latest posts
Load more
๐คadenadel๐1mo๐ผ5๐จ๏ธ0
๐คadenadel๐2y๐ผ2๐จ๏ธ0
(Replying to PARENT post)
People have called Tacoma Tacompton for a long time. Tacoma has come a long way over the last couple decades and is now one of the fastest moving real estate markets in the country.
For those who have never heard of the Hilltop shootout:
https://www.military.com/history/time-army-rangers-got-gunfi...
๐คadenadel๐3y๐ผ0๐จ๏ธ0
(Replying to PARENT post)
In case anyone is interested, you can get 3x or 4x on YouTube by opening the console and using this one-liner
document.getElementsByTagName("video")[0].playbackRate = 3
๐คadenadel๐4y๐ผ0๐จ๏ธ0
(Replying to PARENT post)
Can someone explain to me why this should be an entirely new company (subsidiary) rather than folding DeepMind's capabilities into Verily and Calico? Are these different groups siloed from one another within Google?
๐คadenadel๐4y๐ผ0๐จ๏ธ0
(Replying to PARENT post)
If you're not a customer of a bank and you come to cash a check (that isn't drawn on that bank) then you are going to pay a fee (if they will even cash it). I assume check cashing businesses charge a similar fee.
It would be great in principle if the USPS could cash checks for free, but they are also taking on the risk of the check being bad.
๐คadenadel๐4y๐ผ0๐จ๏ธ0
(Replying to PARENT post)
Someone who knows the Sunday traffic on Highway 2, I assume.
๐คadenadel๐4y๐ผ0๐จ๏ธ0
(Replying to PARENT post)
I feel bad too. To me it seems like he was hurt by his firing and wanted to retain no connection to the company.
๐คadenadel๐4y๐ผ0๐จ๏ธ0
๐คadenadel๐4y๐ผ22๐จ๏ธ12
(Replying to PARENT post)
Presumably someone could take other positions to hedge away all of the other holdings in the fund so that (to a first order approximation) their only exposure is SpaceX, right?
(I only know the basics of investing)
๐คadenadel๐4y๐ผ0๐จ๏ธ0
(Replying to PARENT post)
Hm, I'm not so sure that just because the definition of a bijection is technical that it is not intuitive.
I'll start an enumeration of the rationals
1 1/3
2 1/4
3 1/5
...
If you can prove that you can do this, is that really so non-colloquial? It is certainly what we mean by "as many" for all finite sets, so what is wrong with doing this for infinitely many sets?
๐คadenadel๐4y๐ผ0๐จ๏ธ0
(Replying to PARENT post)
In fact, almost all numbers are transcendental (algebraic numbers have measure zero).
๐คadenadel๐4y๐ผ0๐จ๏ธ0
๐คadenadel๐4y๐ผ4๐จ๏ธ0
(Replying to PARENT post)