gsatic

πŸ“… Joined in 2022

πŸ”Ό 903 Karma

✍️ 591 posts

πŸŒ€
15 latest posts

Load

(Replying to PARENT post)

Things are always changing.

The US and its mindless dynamics definately could use a kick in the teeth to speed up the change. But its happening with interest rates rising, dedollarization etc. Some rich folk who think nothing is changing and their behavior doesnt need to change, their story wont end well.

They dont have as much control over anything as they think. In fact I think rich people are going to take the biggest hit mentally, financially, socially cause its very precarious having wealth without control over what happens tomorrow morning.

πŸ‘€gsaticπŸ•‘2yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Only partly cuz Content is easy to copy and duplicate and rebroadcast. All of which the platforms have made free and easy. That has to be addressed.

Cuz One journo surfaces info. 6000 journos copy it and broadcast it and all expect to paid.

The solutions have to built around content reduction cuz right now we are over loaded with millions of people creating nothing new and expecting to be rewarded.

πŸ‘€gsaticπŸ•‘2yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Google was supposed to solve the info overload problem that growing networks produce.

Instead they focused on growing the network and making content creation and broadcast of content free.

So today less than .5% of content produced is consumed according to the UN report on the attention economy.

Whats the fix? Content production needs to be scaled down. A better system is required that decides Who gets to broadcast, how much and when. Bandwith Advertising consumes within such a system must have a cap. Now there is no cap. Ads can be shown on everywhere and all the time. "Scaling things up" should be a political/social decision not a business/technical decision.

The focus must be brought back to solving info overload.

πŸ‘€gsaticπŸ•‘2yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Interview question I got once - The Taj Mahal took 27 years to build, if you could work on something for 27 years what would you pick?
πŸ‘€gsaticπŸ•‘2yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Its pretty much how any org/institution that deals with a little too much day to day unpredictability and randomness functions.

They learn quickly that lot of the problems they have to solve dont have solutions and are above their resource/skill level. So the goals turn defensive. Dont get blamed. Avoid the hard/unpredictable and complex. Survive long enough to collect pension and become a netflix advisor.

No one with a choice wants these jobs.

πŸ‘€gsaticπŸ•‘2yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

The fix is to make monthly rent = monthly mortgage payments (which ever is less) when ever and where ever there is a mismatch.
πŸ‘€gsaticπŸ•‘2yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

With this stuff everything boils down to how you answer a simple question (which usually most people hardly think about or are encouraged to think about) which is - Do you know how to produce Faith?

In yourself (or others). Faith that you can do things, no one including yourself thinks you can.

If you sit down and think about that question, and spend time experimenting with different answers, what you will come up with, wont be too different from what all the religions of the world or djoko comes up with to generate Faith. Which is stories. myths. imagery. rituals etc. The more faith you need to generate the more absurd the methods can look to an external observer. But what matters is not the absurdity (especially if its not hurting anyone else) but whether the methods have caused your Faith gauge to see an uptick.

So go try and see what you come up for yourself or for someone else, next time there is a big challenge ahead. It will help you understand what you see others trying to do.

πŸ‘€gsaticπŸ•‘2yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Just ignore the AI hype herd. People who are pulling predictions out of their ass, have never had to deal day to day with the bugs these systems produce. You will never see a single person who works on production AI(not toy ai or research ai) making predictions cuz they are too busy staring at exploding bug lists.
πŸ‘€gsaticπŸ•‘2yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

Social medias prime feature is broadcast capability. For free.

In other forms of media (books, newspapers, radio, tv, phones/sms, chat, email) if you try to broadcast your important thoughts to everyone on the planet you get a giant bill.

Speech was free. But Broadcast capability was not.

The unintented main feature of social media is broadcast being free. And the main unanswered question is why should it be free?

If all the neurons in your brain were broadcasting simultaneously to every other neuron the only outcome is seizures.

The EU has not answered this.

It has instead told the platforms they will be held responsible for seizures.

Someone has to come up with better answers about how we all coordinate broadcasting. Otherwise we will keep seeing scary and shocking seizures.

πŸ‘€gsaticπŸ•‘2yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0
πŸ‘€gsaticπŸ•‘2yπŸ”Ό1πŸ—¨οΈ0

(Replying to PARENT post)

The EU has not been able to produce pan EU leaders. Without such leaders its not possible to counter such type of politics.
πŸ‘€gsaticπŸ•‘2yπŸ”Ό0πŸ—¨οΈ0
πŸ‘€gsaticπŸ•‘2yπŸ”Ό1πŸ—¨οΈ0
πŸ‘€gsaticπŸ•‘2yπŸ”Ό2πŸ—¨οΈ0
πŸ‘€gsaticπŸ•‘2yπŸ”Ό1πŸ—¨οΈ1
πŸ‘€gsaticπŸ•‘2yπŸ”Ό1πŸ—¨οΈ0